Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36751 - 36760 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 36751 - 36760 of 64954 for or b.
State v. Leonard J. Harvey
: .… (b) While the person is in or on or otherwise within 1000 feet of any of the following: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2315 - 2005-03-31
: .… (b) While the person is in or on or otherwise within 1000 feet of any of the following: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2315 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] something pretty benign … [b]ut when we address the rest of it, causing the death of a child, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
] something pretty benign … [b]ut when we address the rest of it, causing the death of a child, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
Certification
; (b) That those engaging in the practice know of the inability of customers to receive benefits
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66895 - 2011-06-29
; (b) That those engaging in the practice know of the inability of customers to receive benefits
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66895 - 2011-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the prejudice prong of Strickland. See State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 774, 596 N.W.2d 749 (1999). b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435213 - 2021-10-06
the prejudice prong of Strickland. See State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 774, 596 N.W.2d 749 (1999). b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435213 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
State v. George Taylor
the basis for its removal of four men from the panel. B. Substantial Probability Definition. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
the basis for its removal of four men from the panel. B. Substantial Probability Definition. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
and no individuals who are otherwise eligible are made ineligible for such assistance.” 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(r)(2)(B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3365 - 2017-09-19
and no individuals who are otherwise eligible are made ineligible for such assistance.” 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(r)(2)(B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael S. Johnson v. Gerald Berge
of WIS. STAT. § 421.401(2)(b), the court said: “In this case we have a statutory requirement (venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5116 - 2017-09-19
of WIS. STAT. § 421.401(2)(b), the court said: “In this case we have a statutory requirement (venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gregory M. Sanders
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13814 - 2014-09-15
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13814 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or her remaining initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See Wis. Stat. §§ 302.045(3m)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90711 - 2012-12-17
or her remaining initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See Wis. Stat. §§ 302.045(3m)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90711 - 2012-12-17