Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36751 - 36760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 36751 - 36760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Philip Arreola v. State
," that Arreola and McCann have standing to challenge the trial court's order. As a result, we neither consider
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8738 - 2017-09-19
," that Arreola and McCann have standing to challenge the trial court's order. As a result, we neither consider
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8738 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. In 1992, Jackson was convicted following a jury trial of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm. In 1992, Jackson was convicted following a jury trial of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. D'Angelo
in the trial court, but the trial court refused to consider the matter. Consequently, D’Angelo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2317 - 2017-09-19
in the trial court, but the trial court refused to consider the matter. Consequently, D’Angelo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2317 - 2017-09-19
State v. Demitrius Jackson
from the trial testimony of two members of the Milwaukee Police Department. The police received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24979 - 2006-05-01
from the trial testimony of two members of the Milwaukee Police Department. The police received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24979 - 2006-05-01
CA Blank Order
). The only potential issue for appeal is the trial court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109332 - 2014-03-18
). The only potential issue for appeal is the trial court’s imposition of sentence following revocation. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109332 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
Larry F. Reynolds v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
No. 03-1258 2 area. However, the trial court ruled that this disputed area was already part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6471 - 2017-09-19
No. 03-1258 2 area. However, the trial court ruled that this disputed area was already part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6471 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James W. McCone
of [the form].” (Emphasis added.) ¶4 The trial court rejected McCone’s argument. The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2717 - 2017-09-19
of [the form].” (Emphasis added.) ¶4 The trial court rejected McCone’s argument. The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2717 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
while the trial was going on, in violation of court order. The court conducted a voir dire of all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93229 - 2014-09-15
while the trial was going on, in violation of court order. The court conducted a voir dire of all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93229 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
he could not make a “deliberate choice to proceed without counsel” because the trial court in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
he could not make a “deliberate choice to proceed without counsel” because the trial court in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
Putskey, Trial Court Clerk-0384 T.C.# 94-CF-12 Waushara County Courthouse 209 Saint Marie Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12349 - 2017-09-21
Putskey, Trial Court Clerk-0384 T.C.# 94-CF-12 Waushara County Courthouse 209 Saint Marie Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12349 - 2017-09-21