Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
analysis, we look at the facts of the particular case and then assess the reasonableness of the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
analysis, we look at the facts of the particular case and then assess the reasonableness of the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark H. Price
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James M. Smith
requested the trial court to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19
requested the trial court to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition, because Rodriguez-Faustino has cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
. In addition, because Rodriguez-Faustino has cited no case law supporting his novel theory that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
Janis Peters-Doering v. American Continental Insurance Company
a judgment entered in Janis Peters-Doering’s favor in a “slip and fall” case brought by Peters-Doering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11640 - 2005-03-31
a judgment entered in Janis Peters-Doering’s favor in a “slip and fall” case brought by Peters-Doering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03