Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Christopher Deon Vance
statement of the maximum sentences. The court noted that pursuant to the information, Vance faced a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5772 - 2005-03-31
statement of the maximum sentences. The court noted that pursuant to the information, Vance faced a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5772 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reflects the trial court’s statement that the declarations page and the reducing clause must be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
reflects the trial court’s statement that the declarations page and the reducing clause must be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
[PDF]
Jasmina Ivankovic v. Barbara Giuliani
as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mark Kivley v. The City of Milwaukee
precluded a fair and impartial hearing. In Marris, our supreme court asserted that “a clear statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15417 - 2017-09-21
precluded a fair and impartial hearing. In Marris, our supreme court asserted that “a clear statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15417 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman O. Brown
that is an accurate statement of the law. See § 971.31(10), Stats. Nor do we believe the facts of this case show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
that is an accurate statement of the law. See § 971.31(10), Stats. Nor do we believe the facts of this case show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman O. Brown
that is an accurate statement of the law. See § 971.31(10), Stats. Nor do we believe the facts of this case show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
that is an accurate statement of the law. See § 971.31(10), Stats. Nor do we believe the facts of this case show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
from street level drug dealers and then noted the risk Jones assumed “by the statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
from street level drug dealers and then noted the risk Jones assumed “by the statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob E. Herman
and that it is a mandatory penalty. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. Statement of Facts ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3885 - 2005-03-31
and that it is a mandatory penalty. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. Statement of Facts ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3885 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carrie K. Elmer
of possession with intent to deliver, could testify that he made statements incriminating himself as the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
of possession with intent to deliver, could testify that he made statements incriminating himself as the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31