Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 36761 - 36770 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
State v. Gerald D. Taylor
from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[1] motion. Taylor claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[1] motion. Taylor claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Rufus Patterson West, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court that denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149075 - 2017-09-21
. Rufus Patterson West, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court that denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149075 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] Appellate counsel, Scott D
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion.[1] Appellate counsel, Scott D
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of motions for reconsideration and relief from judgment. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
denial of motions for reconsideration and relief from judgment. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in entering into a stipulation with the State under which Meyers agreed to suspend proceedings on his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523089 - 2022-05-25
in entering into a stipulation with the State under which Meyers agreed to suspend proceedings on his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523089 - 2022-05-25
State v. Charles W. Dawn
conclude that his motion is barred under Escalona. Therefore, we affirm. In l982
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
conclude that his motion is barred under Escalona. Therefore, we affirm. In l982
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2012AP1540 2012AP1541 3 Crystal G. She argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
2012AP1540 2012AP1541 3 Crystal G. She argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, and federal court. As relevant to this appeal, Wingo filed a motion to modify sentence/Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112201 - 2014-05-07
, and federal court. As relevant to this appeal, Wingo filed a motion to modify sentence/Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112201 - 2014-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion for a mistrial because the jury, during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
argues that the trial court erroneously denied her motion for a mistrial because the jury, during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88561 - 2012-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion without a hearing. Because McCradic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09
order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion without a hearing. Because McCradic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09