Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
separate cases. Van Brocklin filed motions to suppress in both cases, challenging the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81889 - 2012-05-02
separate cases. Van Brocklin filed motions to suppress in both cases, challenging the legality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81889 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
WI APP 92
2013 WI APP 92 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2758
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98477 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 92 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2758
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 48
2008 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP1048
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP1048
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31857 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Emmett J. Wimmer
, 305-06, 128 N.W.2d 645 (1964). In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5762 - 2017-09-19
, 305-06, 128 N.W.2d 645 (1964). In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5762 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
of proof at trial has failed to demonstrate the existence of an element essential to that party’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13264 - 2017-09-21
of proof at trial has failed to demonstrate the existence of an element essential to that party’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13264 - 2017-09-21
Scott Mullen v. Gerald VandeVoort
claims action, Case No. 02-SC-443, against VandeVoort. ¶6 On March 25, 2002, the parties settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2005-03-31
claims action, Case No. 02-SC-443, against VandeVoort. ¶6 On March 25, 2002, the parties settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2014-12-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2014-12-29
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case, Glaunert renewed his probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case, Glaunert renewed his probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal and for filing a civil action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal and for filing a civil action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2015-04-02
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2015-04-02