Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 84686 for case number.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 84686 for case number.
State v. Steve Norton
2001 WI App 245 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3538-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 245 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3538-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd S. Meske
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county. But nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11584 - 2017-09-19
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county. But nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11584 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jamie Lee Moore
criminal. The two cases were consolidated. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the former charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9928 - 2005-03-31
criminal. The two cases were consolidated. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the former charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the four cases is whether each of the four employers impermissibly asked applicants about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50274 - 2014-09-15
of the four cases is whether each of the four employers impermissibly asked applicants about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50274 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas Deffke
affirms. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from the events surrounding a high school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
affirms. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from the events surrounding a high school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31