Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The record supports the circuit court’s determination that P.C. was dangerous under WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507618 - 2022-04-13
The record supports the circuit court’s determination that P.C. was dangerous under WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507618 - 2022-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Charles Brown
on the record: What we have done here, I want to make the record clear[,] is try and structure the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7011 - 2017-09-20
on the record: What we have done here, I want to make the record clear[,] is try and structure the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7011 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to process” that was not supported by evidence in the record. ¶5 In response, the State argues first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
to process” that was not supported by evidence in the record. ¶5 In response, the State argues first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
repeatedly. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (1)(e) (requiring appropriate references to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
repeatedly. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (1)(e) (requiring appropriate references to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
has not shown that the trial court relied on its statement. See id., ¶22. In fact, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion without an evidentiary hearing after concluding that the record conclusively demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
the motion without an evidentiary hearing after concluding that the record conclusively demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
State v. William J. Gruber
. § 752.35: In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4332 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.35: In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the present crime, and the conviction remained of record and unreversed. WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1)(a), (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15
of the present crime, and the conviction remained of record and unreversed. WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1)(a), (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15