Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 40006 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 36771 - 36780 of 40006 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Pearson. [4] In a prior statement to police, Hart stated Vandenberg admitted that he “rolled” a guy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53664 - 2010-08-23
and Pearson. [4] In a prior statement to police, Hart stated Vandenberg admitted that he “rolled” a guy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53664 - 2010-08-23
State v. Carl C. Martin
that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31
that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is already underway. Nelson’s whole argument on this issue incorrectly relies on statements in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21
is already underway. Nelson’s whole argument on this issue incorrectly relies on statements in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Clause. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) (out-of-court testimonial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366763 - 2021-05-13
Clause. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) (out-of-court testimonial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366763 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Lenny P. Keding
of the department. The department shall submit a statement showing probable cause of the detention
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16399 - 2017-09-21
of the department. The department shall submit a statement showing probable cause of the detention
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kenyota A.
with the court’s earlier statement that it was available on November 13. ¶23 Because Kenyota supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3873 - 2017-09-20
with the court’s earlier statement that it was available on November 13. ¶23 Because Kenyota supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3873 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Brophy’s “agent” was verbally notified. ¶15 To begin, we note that Brophy’s statement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52591 - 2014-09-15
that Brophy’s “agent” was verbally notified. ¶15 To begin, we note that Brophy’s statement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
Schrauth's allegedly misleading and erroneous statements and illegally seized evidence to obtain the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19
Schrauth's allegedly misleading and erroneous statements and illegally seized evidence to obtain the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.” That is a correct statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald D. Barr
statement may simply seem compassionate. However, an officer is not required to eliminate every innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31
statement may simply seem compassionate. However, an officer is not required to eliminate every innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31