Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36781 - 36790 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36781 - 36790 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
referred the case to the district attorney’s office, which received the referral on February 16, 2005, five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
referred the case to the district attorney’s office, which received the referral on February 16, 2005, five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
of these No. 2009AP436-CR 4 secondary factors, but rather only those relevant to the particular case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45860 - 2014-09-15
of these No. 2009AP436-CR 4 secondary factors, but rather only those relevant to the particular case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions, one for robbery with use of force arising in Milwaukee County case No. 2005CF1059
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
convictions, one for robbery with use of force arising in Milwaukee County case No. 2005CF1059
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6101 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6101 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
, 433 N.W.2d 243 (1989), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
, 433 N.W.2d 243 (1989), is analogous to her case; (3) the requirements for filing a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
be addressed); State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (“cases should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
be addressed); State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (“cases should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15