Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36781 - 36790 of 83948 for case search.
Search results 36781 - 36790 of 83948 for case search.
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
. There is no mechanism by which Wisconsin could compel Iowa to give Wisconsin priority over Kentucky's cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146987 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146987 - 2017-09-21
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
decline to address it. We affirm. ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
decline to address it. We affirm. ¶2 The facts and procedural history of this case are lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19702 - 2005-09-21
State v. Babette Davis
discretion because it indicated its belief that probation should never be an option in any drug cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
discretion because it indicated its belief that probation should never be an option in any drug cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Rogers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Rogers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 3, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
in the underlying criminal case. The circuit court dismissed Hambly’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98824 - 2013-07-02
in the underlying criminal case. The circuit court dismissed Hambly’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98824 - 2013-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
”) in this personal injury case. Schaefer argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125851 - 2017-09-21
”) in this personal injury case. Schaefer argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125851 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP1301 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033328 - 2025-11-05
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP1301 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033328 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this case is a matter of great public importance. Vos and the commission argue that the issue presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054013 - 2025-12-23
this case is a matter of great public importance. Vos and the commission argue that the issue presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054013 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
matters in a paternity case. Johnston contends that he was denied meaningful access to the court when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154956 - 2017-09-21
matters in a paternity case. Johnston contends that he was denied meaningful access to the court when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154956 - 2017-09-21