Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36791 - 36800 of 57196 for id.
Search results 36791 - 36800 of 57196 for id.
State v. Donnis J.
addressee to fight. See id. The test has been met here. Donnis’ comment was intended to provoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13781 - 2005-03-31
addressee to fight. See id. The test has been met here. Donnis’ comment was intended to provoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13781 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Jon Jurkovic
situation where double jeopardy bars a retrial is where the State asked for the mistrial. See id., 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5859 - 2017-09-19
situation where double jeopardy bars a retrial is where the State asked for the mistrial. See id., 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5859 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Yourchuck Video, Inc. v. Burnett County
). However, the ordinance at issue in Quick did, in fact, provide a limited variance, id. at 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18803 - 2017-09-21
). However, the ordinance at issue in Quick did, in fact, provide a limited variance, id. at 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., 392 U.S. at 23. The officers thus had the right to see Johnson’s hands so they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71744 - 2014-09-15
.” Id., 392 U.S. at 23. The officers thus had the right to see Johnson’s hands so they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by it and other vendors. Id., ¶20. In May 2016, the case returned to the circuit court. In an order dated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
by it and other vendors. Id., ¶20. In May 2016, the case returned to the circuit court. In an order dated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
Gloria J. Unzen v. Overhead Door Company of Duluth
reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence. Id. We are even more deferential when, as here, the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7190 - 2005-03-31
reasonable inferences drawn from that evidence. Id. We are even more deferential when, as here, the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the status of a misdemeanor to a felony.” Id. On appeal, Ramirez-Valdez maintains that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
the status of a misdemeanor to a felony.” Id. On appeal, Ramirez-Valdez maintains that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
subject-matter jurisdiction only where the complaint does not charge an offense known to law.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104498 - 2013-11-18
subject-matter jurisdiction only where the complaint does not charge an offense known to law.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104498 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutionality, and must be shown to be unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. ¶4 Moreover, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
of constitutionality, and must be shown to be unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. ¶4 Moreover, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15
, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15