Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36801 - 36810 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 36801 - 36810 of 62306 for child support.
State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
the resisting count because probable cause existed to support VanZeeland's arrest; (2) the resisting count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2005-03-31
the resisting count because probable cause existed to support VanZeeland's arrest; (2) the resisting count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
of revocation, claiming that the officer did not possess the requisite probable cause to support the arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
of revocation, claiming that the officer did not possess the requisite probable cause to support the arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nothing more in support of this claim, and we agree with the State that his contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
nothing more in support of this claim, and we agree with the State that his contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are supported by the detectives’ unrefuted testimony, and Campbell does not challenge them on appeal. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2009-07-06
are supported by the detectives’ unrefuted testimony, and Campbell does not challenge them on appeal. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37012 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court properly exercised its discretion by determining there was no evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
, the circuit court properly exercised its discretion by determining there was no evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
Maria L. Dorantes v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
Dorantes points to photographic evidence and Jacinto Jacquez’s deposition to support her contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4065 - 2017-09-20
Dorantes points to photographic evidence and Jacinto Jacquez’s deposition to support her contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4065 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James E. Asbury
the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction is that “an appellate court may not substitute its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21696 - 2017-09-21
the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction is that “an appellate court may not substitute its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21696 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the filing of an amended pleading.” In support of his argument, he notes that there is a statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
by the filing of an amended pleading.” In support of his argument, he notes that there is a statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
State v. James E. Janssen
given at the suppression hearing as support for his claim that the initial entry and search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
given at the suppression hearing as support for his claim that the initial entry and search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
James E. Johnson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
(Ct. App. 1985). Moreover, Johnson offers no support for his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1985). Moreover, Johnson offers no support for his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31