Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36811 - 36820 of 68326 for did.
Search results 36811 - 36820 of 68326 for did.
CA Blank Order
not indicated that he did not understand some aspect of his plea. [5] Castillo-Puac subsequently obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
not indicated that he did not understand some aspect of his plea. [5] Castillo-Puac subsequently obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
Clarence E. Talbert v. Affiliated Carriage Systems, Inc.
did not generally permit passengers or off-duty workers to drive its cabs. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2949 - 2017-09-19
did not generally permit passengers or off-duty workers to drive its cabs. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2949 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with Kimmons. The report’s author stated Kimmons did not provide “substantial evidence” of the allegation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100727 - 2017-09-21
with Kimmons. The report’s author stated Kimmons did not provide “substantial evidence” of the allegation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100727 - 2017-09-21
Marathon County v. Terry R.H.
not sufficiently developed an appellate argument and that, in any event, the statement at issue did not prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12794 - 2005-03-31
not sufficiently developed an appellate argument and that, in any event, the statement at issue did not prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12794 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77700 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2023-24).1 Jones was advised of his right to file a response, but he did not do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014761 - 2025-09-23
. RULE 809.32 (2023-24).1 Jones was advised of his right to file a response, but he did not do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014761 - 2025-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not impose.” He sought credit for the “street time” he had spent on release and asked to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88942 - 2012-11-05
court did not impose.” He sought credit for the “street time” he had spent on release and asked to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88942 - 2012-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal, Limehouse did not pursue his suppression challenge. While Limehouse’s direct appeal was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
appeal, Limehouse did not pursue his suppression challenge. While Limehouse’s direct appeal was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
that the Wisconsin legislature did not intend that a defendant be prosecuted under both § 943.20(1)(e), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9696 - 2005-03-31
that the Wisconsin legislature did not intend that a defendant be prosecuted under both § 943.20(1)(e), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To the extent that the circuit court did not sufficiently explain its exercise of discretion, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
To the extent that the circuit court did not sufficiently explain its exercise of discretion, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10