Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36811 - 36820 of 57196 for id.
Search results 36811 - 36820 of 57196 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Id., ¶27. A waiver of counsel is knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69382 - 2014-09-15
was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Id., ¶27. A waiver of counsel is knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69382 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
decision to determine whether it is arbitrary or capricious. Id. at 74. “Arbitrary or capricious conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
decision to determine whether it is arbitrary or capricious. Id. at 74. “Arbitrary or capricious conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
State v. John M. Shelley
of physical inability, is an improper refusal which invokes the penalties of the statute. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21
of physical inability, is an improper refusal which invokes the penalties of the statute. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel D. Brown
needs of the defendant and the need to protect the public. Id. at 264. Finally, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
needs of the defendant and the need to protect the public. Id. at 264. Finally, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and (4) prejudice to the defendant.” Id. at 509. A twelve-month period of delay is the minimum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
; and (4) prejudice to the defendant.” Id. at 509. A twelve-month period of delay is the minimum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on its common and ordinary meaning. Id. If the language is plain and unambiguous, the analysis stops
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103893 - 2017-09-21
on its common and ordinary meaning. Id. If the language is plain and unambiguous, the analysis stops
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103893 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Garth E. Coates
, e.g., id at 221-22, 371 N.W.2d at 388-89. Coates also argues that the evidence that the child's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8747 - 2017-09-19
, e.g., id at 221-22, 371 N.W.2d at 388-89. Coates also argues that the evidence that the child's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8747 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
utility. See id., ¶8. Thus, even assuming that the staff’s reports and Anthony R.’s file constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101725 - 2013-09-04
utility. See id., ¶8. Thus, even assuming that the staff’s reports and Anthony R.’s file constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101725 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Id. Then, if necessary, the inmate may seek review of the DOC’s decision by writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629770 - 2023-03-07
.” Id. Then, if necessary, the inmate may seek review of the DOC’s decision by writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629770 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the performance of the work, and (4) right to fire or terminate the employment relationship. Id., ¶88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43890 - 2014-09-15
for the performance of the work, and (4) right to fire or terminate the employment relationship. Id., ¶88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43890 - 2014-09-15