Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 84464 for simple case search.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 84464 for simple case search.
State v. Wade L.
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
, Tratz filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
, Tratz filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516084 - 2022-05-04
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516084 - 2022-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan Triggs
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22