Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 56178 for so.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 56178 for so.
COURT OF APPEALS
hour when she encountered Trooper Breeser. However, she testified that she was doing so because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97208 - 2013-05-22
hour when she encountered Trooper Breeser. However, she testified that she was doing so because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97208 - 2013-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
only consider evidence before it, so a party failing to present evidence on a defendant’s ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33021 - 2008-06-16
only consider evidence before it, so a party failing to present evidence on a defendant’s ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33021 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the DOC to apply sentence credit because the record reflected that the DOC had already done so. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
the DOC to apply sentence credit because the record reflected that the DOC had already done so. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the DOC to apply sentence credit because the record reflected that the DOC had already done so. Edwards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
the DOC to apply sentence credit because the record reflected that the DOC had already done so. Edwards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defect, and they chose not to do so.” The court made no finding of egregious conduct or bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82382 - 2014-09-15
the defect, and they chose not to do so.” The court made no finding of egregious conduct or bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82382 - 2014-09-15
State v. Carolyn A. Sullivan
are not in dispute, so we proceed with the constitutional inquiry. We conclude that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13952 - 2013-05-01
are not in dispute, so we proceed with the constitutional inquiry. We conclude that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13952 - 2013-05-01
CA Blank Order
“as an individual, and also as authorized agent for the company.” However, the syntax used is not so clear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107717 - 2014-01-30
“as an individual, and also as authorized agent for the company.” However, the syntax used is not so clear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107717 - 2014-01-30
CA Blank Order
not be entitled—we would not be entitled to get the victim’s mental health or physical records, so I am
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
not be entitled—we would not be entitled to get the victim’s mental health or physical records, so I am
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
CA Blank Order
Stats.). The sentence was well within the maximum Knutson faced, and therefore was not so excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
Stats.). The sentence was well within the maximum Knutson faced, and therefore was not so excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
State v. Thomas B.
and, in so holding, defined danger to the public. See id. at 18. The court quoted federal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20795 - 2007-05-22
and, in so holding, defined danger to the public. See id. at 18. The court quoted federal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20795 - 2007-05-22