Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 36821 - 36830 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Nathan W. Schley
”), first offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26214 - 2017-09-21
”), first offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record confirms that Lalor properly waived his right to a trial within ninety days of the probable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164987 - 2017-09-21
of the record confirms that Lalor properly waived his right to a trial within ninety days of the probable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164987 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
assaulting his wife’s daughter. He testified on his own behalf at trial. During his testimony, he minimized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26931 - 2006-10-25
assaulting his wife’s daughter. He testified on his own behalf at trial. During his testimony, he minimized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26931 - 2006-10-25
Timothy J. Weiss v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Timothy Weiss appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15064 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Timothy Weiss appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15064 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 380. ¶4 The trial court correctly concluded Zendejas is not entitled to the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2011-06-07
. Id. at 380. ¶4 The trial court correctly concluded Zendejas is not entitled to the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2011-06-07
State v. James M. Pirk
a defense was violated by an evidentiary ruling. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11201 - 2005-03-31
a defense was violated by an evidentiary ruling. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to seek appellate review of the trial court’s reopening of the judgment of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2015-08-02
to seek appellate review of the trial court’s reopening of the judgment of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2015-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
, but did not think that the OWI was that serious. The trial court concluded that Sweeney’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
, but did not think that the OWI was that serious. The trial court concluded that Sweeney’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, he saw that it “did cross the white fog line.” There was a videotape of the incident and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
, he saw that it “did cross the white fog line.” There was a videotape of the incident and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
CA Blank Order
operating with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his blood. At trial, Buttitta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24
operating with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his blood. At trial, Buttitta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24