Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36831 - 36840 of 65143 for or b.

COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Mejias testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114891 - 2014-06-23

Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
. Also increase by the same percentage applied to Coverage A the limits of liability for Coverages B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25506 - 2006-06-12

[PDF] State v. Alfonso Dennis
that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. B. “Other Acts” Evidence. Dennis next claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12795 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings 5 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412227 - 2021-08-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(a) The person knows that he or she possesses or has accessed the material. (b) The person knows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289730 - 2020-09-23

[PDF] WI APP 82
is subject to the judicial jurisdiction of the state; and (b) the chattel to be applied is within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114633 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Paul Wozniak
to the PSI information was prejudicial. B. Expert Testimony Wozniak argues that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20

State v. Sylvester Hughes
were deemed appropriate “[b]ecause they covered circumstances which made stealing particularly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12164 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
right to claim on appeal that the evidence was erroneously admitted. B. Character Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12

State v. Jose S. Soto
. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision. B. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2005-03-31