Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36831 - 36840 of 76894 for see.

Martha Sue Gatten v. Eileen Perket
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25937 - 2006-07-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
had a “rational and explainable basis.” See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶76, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218703 - 2018-09-12

Lee Boyd v. Ralph Gesualdo
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4177 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456255 - 2021-11-24

State v. Willie J. Dobson
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7936 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael F. Levickis
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7414 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53364 - 2010-08-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242349 - 2019-06-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582581 - 2022-10-27

State v. Craig A. Felten
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3918 - 2005-03-31