Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36841 - 36850 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36841 - 36850 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Wesley H.
[their] physical health.” ¶2 Wesley argues that the circuit court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3953 - 2017-09-20
[their] physical health.” ¶2 Wesley argues that the circuit court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3953 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Wesley H.
[their] physical health.” ¶2 Wesley argues that the circuit court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3954 - 2017-09-20
[their] physical health.” ¶2 Wesley argues that the circuit court erred: (1) in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3954 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order denying his postconviction motions. Lee contends that he is entitled to a new trial because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27
, and an order denying his postconviction motions. Lee contends that he is entitled to a new trial because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
any issues of arguable merit exist regarding: (1) the circuit court’s denial of Schoch’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
any issues of arguable merit exist regarding: (1) the circuit court’s denial of Schoch’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
October 18, 2012
. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
. Tramell E. Starks Whether a defendant’s motion to vacate a DNA surcharge counts as a prior motion
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2021
, and unlawful possession of a firearm, and affirmed the denial of Chambers’ postconviction motion for a new
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327359 - 2021-01-21
, and unlawful possession of a firearm, and affirmed the denial of Chambers’ postconviction motion for a new
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327359 - 2021-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motions seeking to dismiss the case were denied and the case was tried to a jury April 21-24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36137 - 2009-04-13
motions seeking to dismiss the case were denied and the case was tried to a jury April 21-24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36137 - 2009-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of conviction and an order denying his motion to suppress all evidence realized from a search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27592 - 2006-12-26
of conviction and an order denying his motion to suppress all evidence realized from a search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27592 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provides a cause of action for invasion of privacy. The circuit court granted Oakwood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683517 - 2023-07-27
provides a cause of action for invasion of privacy. The circuit court granted Oakwood’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683517 - 2023-07-27
Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
brought a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that Wis. Stat. § 66.05(3) was Smith’s exclusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3393 - 2005-03-31
brought a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that Wis. Stat. § 66.05(3) was Smith’s exclusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3393 - 2005-03-31