Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36851 - 36860 of 58285 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
for a breath test amounted to a refusal. The circuit court denied the motion and the case went to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31382 - 2011-02-09

COURT OF APPEALS
trial, of one count of repeated sexual assault of a child, in violation of §§ 948.02(1)(b) and 948.025(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133330 - 2015-01-21

Arlyne M. Lambrecht v. David D. Kaczmarczyk
of res ipsa loquitur is an evidentiary rule[4] that ordinarily arises at trial in determining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17492 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
issues with the trial including sufficiency of the evidence, jury instructions, evidentiary admissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797790 - 2024-07-11

[PDF] Theresa Ann Bushelman v. William Henry Bushelman
-0670 2 grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction. He appeals the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2369 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October
legal custody of him. The trial court expressed concerns about the instability in Lamanda’s life
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2018
to call to testify at the defendant’s trial, and (2) whether the lower courts properly analyzed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218404 - 2018-08-28

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - January 2017
. AllEnergy sought certiorari review of the committee’s decision. The trial court denied the certiorari
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 147
to discovery requests or during the trial. Acuity did produce pre-trial the commercial auto policy it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55515 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Peyton A. Muehlmeier v. Linda Tuffey
-Hummert raises four issues of error: (1) whether the trial court applied the wrong standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11965 - 2014-09-15