Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36861 - 36870 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 36861 - 36870 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
” if it is within the possession, custody or control of the State. The test for determining whether evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27319 - 2014-09-15
” if it is within the possession, custody or control of the State. The test for determining whether evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27319 - 2014-09-15
State v. David M. Womble
of the test are satisfied. State v. Guck, 170 Wis.2d 661, 669, 490 N.W.2d 34, 37 (Ct. App. 1992), aff’d, 176
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
of the test are satisfied. State v. Guck, 170 Wis.2d 661, 669, 490 N.W.2d 34, 37 (Ct. App. 1992), aff’d, 176
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
Randy S. Caflisch v. Julie Staum
opposite any gift, then no gift is made.” Even if we were able to apply the test of substantial compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16084 - 2005-03-31
opposite any gift, then no gift is made.” Even if we were able to apply the test of substantial compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16084 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
. “The test for voluntariness is whether consent to search was given in the absence of duress or coercion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-03-31
. “The test for voluntariness is whether consent to search was given in the absence of duress or coercion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert P. Behm
the legislature has made irrational or arbitrary classifications. Id. The test is not whether the classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2009-07-13
the legislature has made irrational or arbitrary classifications. Id. The test is not whether the classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2009-07-13
CA Blank Order
facto clause. Garner, 529 U.S. at 250. The test is whether retroactive application of a new parole law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2005-03-31
facto clause. Garner, 529 U.S. at 250. The test is whether retroactive application of a new parole law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI App 22
and because he failed to establish that the requested testing would yield evidence “‘relevant to an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59033 - 2012-09-04
and because he failed to establish that the requested testing would yield evidence “‘relevant to an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59033 - 2012-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance and prejudice prongs of the ineffective assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2010-12-21
the deficient performance and prejudice prongs of the ineffective assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2010-12-21
State v. Jose Soto
the second half of the fair and just reason test. “The appropriate and applicable law … is that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
the second half of the fair and just reason test. “The appropriate and applicable law … is that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland test if the defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119209 - 2014-05-22
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland test if the defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119209 - 2014-05-22