Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36871 - 36880 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Jesse Ruiz
, ¶15, 253 Wis. 2d 38, 644 N.W.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Quinton K. Washington
counsel, Washington must show that the two-pronged test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 687 (1984). We need not address both components of this test if the defendant makes an insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96744 - 2014-09-15

James Cowden v. David Kadlec
requirements for the inspection, testing and maintenance of existing water-based fire protection systems. [8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3965 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frederick B. Harvey
employing the Liebnitz totality-of-the-record test, Harvey did not make a direct and specific admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2297 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sky B. Busk
a reasonable doubt. Our “confidence” in the verdict under the Strickland prejudice test must be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25036 - 2017-09-21

William E. Johnson v. Donna M. Johnson
. at 132, 493 N.W.2d at 36. This situation met the “very unusual circumstances” test established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14312 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
heroin buy between Smith and a confidential informant. When field tested, the purchased substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699296 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the familiar two-prong test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09

State v. Richard G. Giese
of a plea should not be tested by determining whether a litany of the formal legal elements was read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31