Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36881 - 36890 of 97621 for court records search online.

Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07

[PDF] Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
: The [sentencing] court considered that the defendant did not have a prior record and that he “was a good family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559204 - 2022-08-30

[PDF] NOTICE
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15

State v. Matrice L.R.
that discretionary authority. See id. We examine whether the court’s decision is reasonably supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lori J. Schroeder
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record factors influencing its decision; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18775 - 2005-07-05

State v. Milton L. Wright
of the trial court whether to declare a mistrial, and the record supports the trial court’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12903 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Milton L. Wright
the sound discretion of the trial court whether to declare a mistrial, and the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12903 - 2017-09-21

Marnae S. v. State
in the record from which this court can conclude that there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10588 - 2005-03-31