Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36891 - 36900 of 84453 for simple case search.
Search results 36891 - 36900 of 84453 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan Triggs
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Susan R. Schlough v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company
applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated by State v. Deetz, 66 Wis.2d 1, 224 N.W.2d 407 (1974
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10580 - 2017-09-20
applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated by State v. Deetz, 66 Wis.2d 1, 224 N.W.2d 407 (1974
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10580 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument from Madison’s attorney about the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
argument from Madison’s attorney about the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19