Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 40298 for Antique ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน antiquewolrd.com ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน antique news ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน clean antique ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน antique brass ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน antiqueworld.

COURT OF APPEALS
sentence, constitutes a new factor. We conclude that Liske has not shown a basis for relief, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2014-06-10

State v. Craig A. Sommer
predator law.โ€ Sommer moved for sentence modification arguing that the new law constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8157 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig A. Sommer
predator law.โ€ Sommer moved for sentence modification arguing that the new law constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification without a hearing; and (3) the Parole Commissionโ€™s denial of his parole is a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59313 - 2011-01-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
modification alleging the following two new factors: (1) that Deroo received a substantially longer sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246911 - 2019-09-18

State v. Allee Boone
in possession of a firearm and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2010-09-08

COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial following his conviction for first-degree intentional homicide. Ott argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35012 - 2008-12-22

[PDF] State v. John Warren
to inquire why Warren requested a new attorney on the day of the trial before denying his request. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14149 - 2014-09-15

Town of Beloit v. Thomas Goodwin
was not entitled to a โ€œnewโ€ trial because he had not had a trial in the municipal court. After conducting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15555 - 2005-03-31

Robert F. Amter v. Ladish Company, Inc.
and postverdict motions. Ladish claims that it is entitled to a new trial because the jury instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9769 - 2005-03-31