Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
motion for summary judgment. Section 227.01(13), Stats., provides in part: "Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
motion for summary judgment. Section 227.01(13), Stats., provides in part: "Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Greendale Education Assocation v. Greendale School District
-year suspension. No. 01-3234 4 ¶6 The Union then brought a motion to confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4651 - 2017-09-19
-year suspension. No. 01-3234 4 ¶6 The Union then brought a motion to confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4651 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64236 - 2014-09-15
homicide, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, in part, his postconviction motion. 2 Brunilson’s postconviction/appellate counsel, Carl W. Chesshir
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207623 - 2018-01-23
, in part, his postconviction motion. 2 Brunilson’s postconviction/appellate counsel, Carl W. Chesshir
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207623 - 2018-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Terrence Buchanan appeals orders that denied his motions for additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98602 - 2014-09-15
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Terrence Buchanan appeals orders that denied his motions for additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98602 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the girls’ mother, Kelly, are divorced; Baer was the custodial parent. He contended the girls falsely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28
and the girls’ mother, Kelly, are divorced; Baer was the custodial parent. He contended the girls falsely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245613 - 2019-08-28