Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 68468 for did.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 68468 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal from the judgment. In 2006, Harris, acting pro se, filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal from the judgment. In 2006, Harris, acting pro se, filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
Michael Cicero v. KAS of Madison, LLC
the landlord, KAS of Madison, LLC, $50 in statutory damages under Wis. Stat. § 806.20(2) because Cicero did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31
the landlord, KAS of Madison, LLC, $50 in statutory damages under Wis. Stat. § 806.20(2) because Cicero did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Cicero v. KAS of Madison, LLC
of Madison, LLC, $50 in statutory damages under WIS. STAT. § 806.20(2) because Cicero did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7300 - 2017-09-20
of Madison, LLC, $50 in statutory damages under WIS. STAT. § 806.20(2) because Cicero did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7300 - 2017-09-20
State v. Torea L. Mitchell
his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that it did. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2200 - 2005-03-31
his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that it did. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Lammers v. James Labell
which required Lammers to file a brief responding to the motion by April 3, 1995. Lammers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11730 - 2017-09-20
which required Lammers to file a brief responding to the motion by April 3, 1995. Lammers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11730 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, as did postconviction counsel by failing to raise the issue of trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28359 - 2007-03-07
, as did postconviction counsel by failing to raise the issue of trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28359 - 2007-03-07
CA Blank Order
, we could not conclude there was no arguable basis for challenging the pleas, as the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137514 - 2014-06-03
, we could not conclude there was no arguable basis for challenging the pleas, as the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137514 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a recommendation of “substantial prison time” did not mean probation, and that trial counsel could not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757473 - 2024-01-30
of a recommendation of “substantial prison time” did not mean probation, and that trial counsel could not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757473 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Dale L. Hamann
allotted, the supreme court decided the issue was waived. Therefore, it did not automatically grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15089 - 2017-09-21
allotted, the supreme court decided the issue was waived. Therefore, it did not automatically grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15089 - 2017-09-21