Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 69109 for he.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 69109 for he.
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP909-CR Complete Titl...
driving, Corrigan had to direct him out of the parking garage, correcting several missteps as he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60548 - 2012-01-22
driving, Corrigan had to direct him out of the parking garage, correcting several missteps as he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60548 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] In the alternative, he argues that this court should reverse his two firearms convictions because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
] In the alternative, he argues that this court should reverse his two firearms convictions because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the benefits that he had received in error. The circuit court affirmed LIRC’s decision, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312466 - 2020-12-10
the benefits that he had received in error. The circuit court affirmed LIRC’s decision, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312466 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witness. C.L.K. testified that when the children were first removed by BMCW, he was not involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197494 - 2017-10-16
witness. C.L.K. testified that when the children were first removed by BMCW, he was not involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197494 - 2017-10-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Alswager indicated that he was also appealing from various pretrial, trial, and post-trial rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
, Alswager indicated that he was also appealing from various pretrial, trial, and post-trial rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated that he was also appealing from various pretrial, trial, and post-trial rulings. In addition, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
indicated that he was also appealing from various pretrial, trial, and post-trial rulings. In addition, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
determine whether he had been entrapped into committing the offense. Ciesla contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21
determine whether he had been entrapped into committing the offense. Ciesla contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert S. Martinez
concentration, nearly twice the legal limit. He claims that additional information supplied by the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
concentration, nearly twice the legal limit. He claims that additional information supplied by the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31