Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3691 - 3700 of 20877 for word.

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 19-13 - Letter to David Pruhs, Executive Secretary, WI Family Court Commissioners Association
Word version of your response to clerk@wicourts.gov. See comment guidelines at the court's website
/supreme/docs/1913letdpruhs.pdf - 2019-08-14

[PDF] 2024AP000729 - 04-16-2024 Court Order
pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font is used. Any motion
/supreme/docs/24ap729oa.pdf - 2024-04-16

[PDF] 2024AP000729 - 2024-06-17 Court Order
shall not exceed 20 pages if a monospaced font is used or 4,400 words if a proportional serif font
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=816086 - 2024-06-17

William J. Evers v. Dennis C. Luebke
. Historically, verification of pleadings requires more than the word “verified” uttered in the notary’s jurat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11737 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Zunker
not require the prosecutor to merely repeat the words “a medium term in the Wisconsin State Prison System
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15990 - 2017-09-21

State v. David P. Baker
. A defendant’s intent “may be inferred from the defendant’s conduct, including his words and gestures taken
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14054 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael R. Zunker
repeat the words “a medium term in the Wisconsin State Prison System” as recommended in the addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15990 - 2005-03-31

Circuit court eFiling - Withdrawing from a case – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
Word (.docx) or Adobe PDF (.pdf) format. Note: Alternatively, you can upload a Notice of Completion
/hc/en-us/articles/360056765492-Circuit-court-eFiling-Withdrawing-from-a-case

[PDF] William J. Evers v. Dennis C. Luebke
of pleadings requires more than the word “verified” uttered in the notary’s jurat. A verification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11737 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
. In other words, there would be no need to refer to “all-terrain vehicle” at all if the exclusion applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141312 - 2015-05-03