Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36901 - 36910 of 65774 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 36901 - 36910 of 65774 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Wagnon
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6998 - 2017-09-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6998 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
. the defendant’s past criminal record, 2. the defendant’s history of undesirable behavior pattern, 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11446 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check charge] case where the defendant filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11446 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Greer
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214936 - 2018-06-26
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214936 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Karen Elaine Gilligan
." Because No. 97-1972-CR 2 there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12726 - 2017-09-21
." Because No. 97-1972-CR 2 there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and submitted a response. Upon consideration of the report, response, and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330437 - 2021-02-03
and submitted a response. Upon consideration of the report, response, and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330437 - 2021-02-03