Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36911 - 36920 of 70067 for hi.
Search results 36911 - 36920 of 70067 for hi.
[PDF]
State v. Lee M. Henrickson
and seizures and, as a result, erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the results of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4812 - 2017-09-20
and seizures and, as a result, erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the results of the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4812 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marlon Lydell Brisco, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81381 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marlon Lydell Brisco, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81381 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report concluding there is no basis to challenge Woller’s sentence after revocation of his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455268 - 2021-11-23
report concluding there is no basis to challenge Woller’s sentence after revocation of his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455268 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or subsequent offense; and (2) felony bail jumping. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736146 - 2023-12-06
or subsequent offense; and (2) felony bail jumping. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736146 - 2023-12-06
State v. James J. Baeten
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9565 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order dismissing his civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Shelton argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484965 - 2022-02-22
order dismissing his civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Shelton argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484965 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Lucas A. Applebee
argues that his statement to police should have been suppressed because it was involuntary. The flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3051 - 2017-09-19
argues that his statement to police should have been suppressed because it was involuntary. The flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3051 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lucas A. Applebee
argues that his statement to police should have been suppressed because it was involuntary. The flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3052 - 2017-09-19
argues that his statement to police should have been suppressed because it was involuntary. The flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3052 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James L. Anderson
that Anderson does not challenge his plea, but requests review on whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10031 - 2017-09-19
that Anderson does not challenge his plea, but requests review on whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10031 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald Joseph Hall
to another and was aware that his conduct created that risk. “Great bodily harm” means serious permanent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11259 - 2017-09-19
to another and was aware that his conduct created that risk. “Great bodily harm” means serious permanent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11259 - 2017-09-19