Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36911 - 36920 of 57293 for id.

State v. Michael W. Jones
without a hearing. Id., 201 Wis.2d at 309-310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. Here, the postconviction motion must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10603 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
would be granted. Id. at 366-67. Here, in contrast, Froelich offered in July 2000 to work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17599 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Martise D. Odems
assistance of counsel claim on either ground. See id. Consequently, if counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13974 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rocky A. Knoble
look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions.” Id. at 591. ¶9 Any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14824 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. No. 2014AP1019-CR 5 ¶6 In order to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128516 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frank Rzepkowski v. Robert Schuenke
exclusions. See id. at 394-95, 591 N.W.2d at 170-72. We explained: [The policy] excludes from coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14197 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
been litigated on direct appeal.” Id. at 172. The statute, however, does not preclude a defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199232 - 2017-10-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
whether a reasonable probability exists that a different result would be reached in a trial. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144643 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the evidence was such that the division could reasonably arrive at its decision. Id. In evaluating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367449 - 2021-05-19

[PDF] NOTICE
to suppress the evidence. Id. at 69. ¶7 When reviewing a claim that evidence was lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42672 - 2014-09-15