Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36961 - 36970 of 67826 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. ¶9 Questions of constitutional fact are mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26882 - 2006-10-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of domestic abuse with use of a dangerous weapon, and one count of threat to a law enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455931 - 2021-11-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
performance was ineffective presents a mixed question of fact and law. Maloney, 281 Wis. 2d 595, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66544 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
also found that Langenberg had acted without lawful authority and suppressed the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14399 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
trial court error, but instead argues that the local ordinances must give way to the “greater law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30485 - 2007-10-02

[PDF] State v. William R. Scott
confinement and forty−five months of extended supervision pursuant to the Truth−in−Sentencing law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of law and fact. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶32, 301 Wis. 2d 642, 734 N.W.2d 115. The court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10

Noah's Ark Family Park v. Board of Review of the Village of Lake Delton
on an erroneous view of the law.[1] ¶3 In 1995 the assessed value of the other commercial properties that had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17106 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
it and the Kinseys and that each of the Kinseys’ claims must fail as a matter of law. In response, the Kinseys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29624 - 2007-07-10

State v. James E. Gray
as a matter of law to establish “intent to deliver” under § 961.41(1m)(b); and (2) his sentence is excessively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3785 - 2005-03-31