Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36971 - 36980 of 57552 for a i x.

State v. Robert W. Huber
. Appeal No. 03-0076-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00CF005477 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6043 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Eugene Makowka v. Kim Dobner
I expect the child to be on an airplane or any way you can get that child back as soon as possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25132 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, the prosecutor made the following relevant commentary during closing argument: [I]t’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
is presumptively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Indeed, “[i]t is axiomatic that the ‘physical entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04

[PDF] John D. Lucin v. Ed B. Altmann
. Accordingly, we conclude that summary judgment was improperly granted and reverse. I. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16094 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I MIDWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194877 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45799 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
melded into the judgment, and I have nothing here before me that would allow me to upset that. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12

[PDF] State v. William Speener
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. WILLIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12022 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14