Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36971 - 36980 of 83161 for case code.
Search results 36971 - 36980 of 83161 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
warrant was constitutionally valid, and we affirm. ¶2 This case began when Cardiel’s son told his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
warrant was constitutionally valid, and we affirm. ¶2 This case began when Cardiel’s son told his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “Protection of the community is absolutely, positively 99 percent of everything in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
, “Protection of the community is absolutely, positively 99 percent of everything in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward Leon Jackson
2004 WI App 190 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2066 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6731 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 190 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2066 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6731 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 266
2006 WI App 266 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1002 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27215 - 2006-12-19
2006 WI App 266 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1002 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27215 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Janice D.
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
cases on the motion of Janice D.’s attorney. Nos. 03-2207 03-2208 3 outside the homes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6780 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Clayton T. Veldt
offense was void. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
offense was void. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5357 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J.J.
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory duties during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory duties during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
Barbara J. King v. JiffyLube Wisconsin
to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. Jiffy Lube alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11197 - 2017-09-19
to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. Jiffy Lube alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11197 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15
not want to nor feel qualified to testify as an expert in this case, and had never spoken to the Blotzers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30831 - 2014-09-15

