Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36991 - 37000 of 68758 for had.

Traci L. Roberts v. Matthew A. Roberts
Matthew had prepared to that effect and the presiding family court commissioner (FCC) approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7555 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a plea. Scott indicates she never consulted with an attorney, nor had she ever before appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79722 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
had signed a guilty plea questionnaire, had gone over it with his attorney, and had understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29632 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
were denied admission into the party. Bonilla had just turned seventeen years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19

Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
. The statements by Poler and Siedschlag were introduced, but neither supported his assertion that he had expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John L. Kuslits
was the victim of prolonged sexual abuse as a child; (3) he had voluntarily entered sexual offender treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6859 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
” because the dispatcher had informed him this was Hinzmann’s fourth offense. The officer wrote “breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19

Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. The parties disagree on whether Andrashko had permission to be in auto-tag. Andrashko claims he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31

Kristine M. Downer-Beuthin v. John J. Beuthin
she asked the court to address rebuttal evidence she had previously presented regarding Beuthin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark H. Brooks
as “actually a dark gray color, the majority, and it had some white on the sleeves.” During the hearing Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31