Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 82271 for case code.
Search results 371 - 380 of 82271 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a single-family residential district. VILLAGE OF UNION GROVE, WIS., CODE § 118-278(3), provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209436 - 2018-03-07
, a single-family residential district. VILLAGE OF UNION GROVE, WIS., CODE § 118-278(3), provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209436 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to maintain the property and to comply with the building code, and that Mill Creek was therefore negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212535 - 2018-05-10
to maintain the property and to comply with the building code, and that Mill Creek was therefore negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212535 - 2018-05-10
Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
suggests a specific committee in a specific case. See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 310.08(3). The rules also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13732 - 2005-03-31
suggests a specific committee in a specific case. See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 310.08(3). The rules also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
in a specific case. See WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.08(3). The rules also provide that ICRS review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13732 - 2014-09-15
in a specific case. See WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.08(3). The rules also provide that ICRS review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13732 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in several safety code violations, including Wis. Admin. Code, Department of Industry, Labor and Human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26614 - 2006-10-02
in several safety code violations, including Wis. Admin. Code, Department of Industry, Labor and Human
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26614 - 2006-10-02
Door County v. Fredric Wittig
ordinance. He argues the judgment should be reversed because (1) the County did not prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
ordinance. He argues the judgment should be reversed because (1) the County did not prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case, Robles was an inmate at Fox Lake Correctional Institution (FLCI) and the Wisconsin Secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
to this case, Robles was an inmate at Fox Lake Correctional Institution (FLCI) and the Wisconsin Secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
” under Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.47. Therefore, the CCE ordered that the case file be returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
” under Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.47. Therefore, the CCE ordered that the case file be returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
principal structure and a private garage is a permitted accessory structure. Eau Claire County, Wis., Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
principal structure and a private garage is a permitted accessory structure. Eau Claire County, Wis., Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
accessory structure. EAU CLAIRE COUNTY, WIS., CODE §§ 18.07.015A., 18.07.025A.1 The maximum height
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66288 - 2014-09-15
accessory structure. EAU CLAIRE COUNTY, WIS., CODE §§ 18.07.015A., 18.07.025A.1 The maximum height
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66288 - 2014-09-15