Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 30001 for de.
Search results 371 - 380 of 30001 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner. She filed a request for a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70929 - 2011-09-20
commissioner. She filed a request for a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70929 - 2011-09-20
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7885 - 2005-03-31
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis. ¶7 In effect, Vernon complains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2495 - 2005-03-31
deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis. ¶7 In effect, Vernon complains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
by the proposed annexation received notice. The court deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2495 - 2017-09-19
by the proposed annexation received notice. The court deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2495 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
Wisconsin End-User Gas Association v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
matter, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12504 - 2005-03-31
matter, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin End-User Gas Association v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe the PSC great deference in matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12504 - 2017-09-21
standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe the PSC great deference in matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12504 - 2017-09-21
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
de novo. The dissent assumes that this is true. For the reasons stated in Part II of this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
de novo. The dissent assumes that this is true. For the reasons stated in Part II of this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31