Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 30059 for de.
Search results 371 - 380 of 30059 for de.
State v. David Entis Rees
The parties disagree on the appellate standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
The parties disagree on the appellate standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
FAS, LLC v. Town of Bass Lake
in the lakeshore frontage calculation; and (2) whether the case should be remanded to the Board for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25357 - 2006-05-30
in the lakeshore frontage calculation; and (2) whether the case should be remanded to the Board for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25357 - 2006-05-30
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
hold a de novo hearing on the discharge only if he determined that the board denied Cummer due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Entis Rees
standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo, citing United States v. Amirault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4353 - 2017-09-19
standard of review. Rees argues that our review should be de novo, citing United States v. Amirault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4353 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner. She filed a request for a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70929 - 2015-02-25
commissioner. She filed a request for a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70929 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
by the proposed annexation received notice. The court deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2495 - 2017-09-19
by the proposed annexation received notice. The court deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2495 - 2017-09-19
Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis. ¶7 In effect, Vernon complains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2495 - 2005-03-31
deemed the difference in the descriptions de minimis. ¶7 In effect, Vernon complains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483690 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin End-User Gas Association v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe the PSC great deference in matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12504 - 2017-09-21
standard of review in this instance is de novo. Although we owe the PSC great deference in matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12504 - 2017-09-21