Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 80649 for petition to establish custody.
Search results 371 - 380 of 80649 for petition to establish custody.
2008 WI APP 20
Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31617 - 2008-02-19
Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31617 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
WI APP 20
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31617 - 2014-09-15
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a change in custody and placement. Moreover, our October 24, 2018 order established a clear procedure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275041 - 2020-08-04
for a change in custody and placement. Moreover, our October 24, 2018 order established a clear procedure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275041 - 2020-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
or may have been in custody because of a bench warrant issued in this case, when he cannot establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
or may have been in custody because of a bench warrant issued in this case, when he cannot establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9508 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9508 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8911 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8911 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
as “impractical,” the Collett court embarked upon uncharted waters and established a new test to determine custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
as “impractical,” the Collett court embarked upon uncharted waters and established a new test to determine custody
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
embarked upon uncharted waters and established a new test to determine custody for purposes of sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
embarked upon uncharted waters and established a new test to determine custody for purposes of sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
Barbara L. Davis v. James G. Davis
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3278 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3278 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
not adequately establish the facts of the defendant's arrest and custody in Illinois. We therefore remanded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52056 - 2010-07-13
not adequately establish the facts of the defendant's arrest and custody in Illinois. We therefore remanded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52056 - 2010-07-13