Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 15685 for probate.
Search results 371 - 380 of 15685 for probate.
Theresa Huml v. Robert W. Vlazny
a judgment derived from a criminal restitution order, after Vlazny was released from probation. ¶2 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25815 - 2006-07-06
a judgment derived from a criminal restitution order, after Vlazny was released from probation. ¶2 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25815 - 2006-07-06
[PDF]
Theresa Huml v. Robert W. Vlazny
enforcing a judgment derived from a criminal restitution order, after Vlazny was released from probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25815 - 2017-09-21
enforcing a judgment derived from a criminal restitution order, after Vlazny was released from probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25815 - 2017-09-21
State v. Seth A. Foster
of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore required a warrant based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25995 - 2006-07-24
of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore required a warrant based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25995 - 2006-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Seth A. Foster - 2005AP002789
that the warrantless search of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25995 - 2017-09-21
that the warrantless search of Foster’s home was a police search and not a probation search, and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25995 - 2017-09-21
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
and Appeals (the Division) revoking Rubadeau’s probation. We affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
and Appeals (the Division) revoking Rubadeau’s probation. We affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
probation. We affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2 Rubadeau was convicted of possession of a controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
probation. We affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2 Rubadeau was convicted of possession of a controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Pierre Davis
recommend consecutive probation on the OMVWOC conviction. At sentencing, the prosecution argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
recommend consecutive probation on the OMVWOC conviction. At sentencing, the prosecution argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
A. DiMotto, presiding. No. 2013AP1163-CR 2 completion of probation. Hemp petitioned
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21
A. DiMotto, presiding. No. 2013AP1163-CR 2 completion of probation. Hemp petitioned
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 4
No Probation Forfeiture + Costs = $811.50 Driver Surcharge = Court Costs = Jail Surcharge = Justice Info
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
No Probation Forfeiture + Costs = $811.50 Driver Surcharge = Court Costs = Jail Surcharge = Justice Info
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
’ (division) determination revoking his probation. He argues that the condition of probation requiring him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31
’ (division) determination revoking his probation. He argues that the condition of probation requiring him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31