Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 371 - 380 of 59677 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 371 - 380 of 59677 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
grantor, a bankruptcy estate. Schick acquired his property in December 1991. His deed described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
grantor, a bankruptcy estate. Schick acquired his property in December 1991. His deed described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
Scott E. Pocius v. Kenosha County
the property by tax deed. Pocius makes no claim that the statutory provisions do not comport with due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14747 - 2005-03-31
the property by tax deed. Pocius makes no claim that the statutory provisions do not comport with due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Scott E. Pocius v. Kenosha County
the law governing tax deed foreclosure. Pocius claimed that these failings deprived him of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14747 - 2017-09-21
the law governing tax deed foreclosure. Pocius claimed that these failings deprived him of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
to pay rent. Faulkner responded to the eviction complaint with various affirmative defenses, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11400 - 2017-09-19
to pay rent. Faulkner responded to the eviction complaint with various affirmative defenses, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11400 - 2017-09-19
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
defenses, claiming, inter alia, that Norman was not the rightful owner of the property because his title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
defenses, claiming, inter alia, that Norman was not the rightful owner of the property because his title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
Lynn Wonka v. Samuel Cari
HOOVER, P.J. Lynn and Jerome Wonka appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
HOOVER, P.J. Lynn and Jerome Wonka appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 8
by quit claim deed and it included the following terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34987 - 2014-09-15
by quit claim deed and it included the following terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34987 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 8
the parcel to Thomas by quit claim deed and it included the following terms: [Thomas would own the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34987 - 2009-01-27
the parcel to Thomas by quit claim deed and it included the following terms: [Thomas would own the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34987 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
- captioned appellant, Sollman. ¶2 Sollman claims the circuit court erroneously concluded that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34045 - 2014-09-15
- captioned appellant, Sollman. ¶2 Sollman claims the circuit court erroneously concluded that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34045 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-captioned appellant, Sollman. ¶2 Sollman claims the circuit court erroneously concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
-captioned appellant, Sollman. ¶2 Sollman claims the circuit court erroneously concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15