Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgments, entered upon his guilty pleas, convicting him of four different offenses in three cases. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252152 - 2020-01-14
judgments, entered upon his guilty pleas, convicting him of four different offenses in three cases. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252152 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
the other charges against Wade. The trial court then asked Wade’s counsel whether he acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34233 - 2014-09-15
the other charges against Wade. The trial court then asked Wade’s counsel whether he acknowledged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34233 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968). “[T]he defendant has the burden to demonstrate the out-of-court photo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38387 - 2008-07-23
States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968). “[T]he defendant has the burden to demonstrate the out-of-court photo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38387 - 2008-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. LaVigne argues that he should be granted a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
for postconviction relief. LaVigne argues that he should be granted a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Scott C. Harty
2 privileges” because he faced a consecutive sentence in Waukesha county is not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15588 - 2017-09-21
2 privileges” because he faced a consecutive sentence in Waukesha county is not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15588 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Martise D. Odems
-CR 2 from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13974 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at which he was found guilty of obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699016 - 2023-09-06
at which he was found guilty of obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699016 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
Chris Spangberg v. John C. Talis
as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3184 - 2017-09-19
as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3184 - 2017-09-19
State v. Otis J. Martin
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
Chris Spangberg v. John C. Talis
no damage as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3184 - 2005-03-31
no damage as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3184 - 2005-03-31