Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals pro se the trial court’s order dismissing his appeal. The Glendale municipal court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31589 - 2014-09-15
appeals pro se the trial court’s order dismissing his appeal. The Glendale municipal court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31589 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
A. HAWLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, P.J. Following a jury trial, Lori J. Schroeder was adjudged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
A. HAWLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, P.J. Following a jury trial, Lori J. Schroeder was adjudged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arthur E. Messick
Messick to fifteen years in prison. When imposing sentence, the trial court also ordered as conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
Messick to fifteen years in prison. When imposing sentence, the trial court also ordered as conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2578 - 2017-09-19
State v. Arthur E. Messick
sentence, the trial court also ordered as conditions of parole that Messick pay restitution, maintain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2578 - 2012-08-20
sentence, the trial court also ordered as conditions of parole that Messick pay restitution, maintain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2578 - 2012-08-20
[PDF]
State v. William Warner Davis
appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial, for second-degree reckless injury, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8765 - 2017-09-19
appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial, for second-degree reckless injury, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8765 - 2017-09-19
State v. Louis Ray
denying his amended postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Ray claims that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5187 - 2005-03-31
denying his amended postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Ray claims that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5187 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all counts. On June 29, 2006, the trial court sentenced Conley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41276 - 2014-09-15
trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all counts. On June 29, 2006, the trial court sentenced Conley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41276 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with a child in violation of § 948.06(1).[2] Following a three-day trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41276 - 2009-10-29
with a child in violation of § 948.06(1).[2] Following a three-day trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41276 - 2009-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
terminating her parental rights to Josh, a child born in 2020, on the basis that her trial attorney provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
terminating her parental rights to Josh, a child born in 2020, on the basis that her trial attorney provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
State v. Charles Johnson
a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23
a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23