Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37001 - 37010 of 83168 for case code.

State v. Luis Vasquez
and shot Erickson. ¶3 The State’s case was based primarily on Berrisford’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3886 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was not an exact quotation of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33186 - 2008-06-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference the case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243634 - 2019-07-17

Dale Furmanski v. Melissa A. Furmanski
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8090 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
withheld evidence that his co-conspirator, Christopher Jones, organized the criminal scheme in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522082 - 2022-05-17

[PDF] State v. Jason D. VanStraten
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6604 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Glenn v. George Huxhold
their complaint. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Because we decide this case principally on procedural grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10650 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Rocky J. Shaw
that the privilege could not be deemed waived in this case because nothing in the record indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11135 - 2017-09-19

Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
against her.[1] The Board, drawing an analogy to probable cause determinations in criminal cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02

City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
tried the case to “a draw” and that therefore the City had failed to prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31