Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37001 - 37010 of 68326 for did.
Search results 37001 - 37010 of 68326 for did.
State v. Adam S. Witczak
. It was his contention that the arresting officer did not have an objectively reasonable suspicion that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31
. It was his contention that the arresting officer did not have an objectively reasonable suspicion that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were explained to Cruz did not mention the purpose of the sexual contact, we required appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
were explained to Cruz did not mention the purpose of the sexual contact, we required appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Wisconsin Attorney General. We conclude the complaint must be dismissed because Sorenson did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139402 - 2017-09-21
the Wisconsin Attorney General. We conclude the complaint must be dismissed because Sorenson did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139402 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred because Gurstel did not prove its claim was not barred by the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
that the court erred because Gurstel did not prove its claim was not barred by the settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to reasonable suspicion necessary for a traffic stop. In particular, Rogers argued that Lambrecht did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57606 - 2010-12-08
to reasonable suspicion necessary for a traffic stop. In particular, Rogers argued that Lambrecht did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57606 - 2010-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
midnight” and did not go anywhere between leaving the pool hall and getting stopped. [R.24:44,51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141300 - 2015-05-05
midnight” and did not go anywhere between leaving the pool hall and getting stopped. [R.24:44,51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141300 - 2015-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
to concede that the substance recovered was cocaine. Brown himself did not speak, and the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
to concede that the substance recovered was cocaine. Brown himself did not speak, and the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63408 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
to receive monthly benefits upon retiring, payable for the rest of Paul’s life. It did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31323 - 2007-12-26
to receive monthly benefits upon retiring, payable for the rest of Paul’s life. It did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31323 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lawyer did not subpoena the arresting police officer, who would have testified that Ward smelled like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153838 - 2017-09-21
lawyer did not subpoena the arresting police officer, who would have testified that Ward smelled like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153838 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case without prejudice for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the State did attempt to bring Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
case without prejudice for a number of reasons. First and foremost, the State did attempt to bring Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09