Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37021 - 37030 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 37021 - 37030 of 65155 for or b.
State v. David J. Lenz
directs our attention to § 948.22(7)(b)1, Stats., contending that this section would be unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31
directs our attention to § 948.22(7)(b)1, Stats., contending that this section would be unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
impairment or injury to herself. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c. B. Reasonable provision for protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133552 - 2015-01-26
impairment or injury to herself. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c. B. Reasonable provision for protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133552 - 2015-01-26
State v. Steven Buckingham
Buckingham’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. B. Motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
Buckingham’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. B. Motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the MEB and had “committed unprofessional conduct as defined by Wis. Admin. Code § MED 10.02(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
of the MEB and had “committed unprofessional conduct as defined by Wis. Admin. Code § MED 10.02(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
Eric Foster v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
where there was none. B. The “most we will pay” language does not render the policy ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6707 - 2005-03-31
where there was none. B. The “most we will pay” language does not render the policy ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven Buckingham
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. B. Motion for sentence modification. Buckingham also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. B. Motion for sentence modification. Buckingham also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b). Based on the squad car video and reasonable inferences from it, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187056 - 2017-09-21
)(b). Based on the squad car video and reasonable inferences from it, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Consequently, this claim fails on the prejudice prong. B. Failure to introduce Little’s toxicology report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27
. Consequently, this claim fails on the prejudice prong. B. Failure to introduce Little’s toxicology report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Gregory M. Sanders
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13814 - 2014-09-15
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance or prejudice stemming from his trial attorney’s handling of the missing witness statement. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
performance or prejudice stemming from his trial attorney’s handling of the missing witness statement. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20