Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37031 - 37040 of 57333 for id.
Search results 37031 - 37040 of 57333 for id.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
by law.” Id. However, in a comment to this substitute paragraph, the Committee cautioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
by law.” Id. However, in a comment to this substitute paragraph, the Committee cautioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
by law.” Id. However, in a comment to this substitute paragraph, the Committee cautioned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
by law.” Id. However, in a comment to this substitute paragraph, the Committee cautioned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Pritchard
to the inquiry, of whether probable cause existed for the arresting officer to request a chemical test. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
to the inquiry, of whether probable cause existed for the arresting officer to request a chemical test. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
to investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion. Id. at 439. An investigatory stop is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4872 - 2017-09-19
to investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion. Id. at 439. An investigatory stop is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4872 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Felipe Ayala
explanation for striking the jurors in question. Id. at 358-59. Finally, the trial court must determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12018 - 2017-09-21
explanation for striking the jurors in question. Id. at 358-59. Finally, the trial court must determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12018 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion. Id. The ultimate question is whether the facts available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion. Id. The ultimate question is whether the facts available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
State v. Gemma L. Kitzman
or even that guilt is more likely than not.” Id. at 357, 525 N.W.2d at 104 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10771 - 2005-03-31
or even that guilt is more likely than not.” Id. at 357, 525 N.W.2d at 104 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10771 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shalamar Bursinger
of the drug,’” id. (citation omitted). ¶14 Bursinger admits that the drugs were found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
of the drug,’” id. (citation omitted). ¶14 Bursinger admits that the drugs were found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence was such that the division could reasonably arrive at its decision. Id. In evaluating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367449 - 2021-05-19
the evidence was such that the division could reasonably arrive at its decision. Id. In evaluating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367449 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
on this question. Id. Here, the appellants contend that the court had no reasonable basis to first order a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4261 - 2017-09-19
on this question. Id. Here, the appellants contend that the court had no reasonable basis to first order a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4261 - 2017-09-19