Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37051 - 37060 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37051 - 37060 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. The first affidavit was filed in September 2005 in opposition to a previous summary judgment motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28412 - 2007-03-13
. The first affidavit was filed in September 2005 in opposition to a previous summary judgment motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28412 - 2007-03-13
State v. Timothy Netzer
by not granting his motion in limine to deny the admissibility of a videotape which portrayed his driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
by not granting his motion in limine to deny the admissibility of a videotape which portrayed his driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony P. Gildemeister
court erred in denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25573 - 2006-06-28
court erred in denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25573 - 2006-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered at his home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77713 - 2012-02-07
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered at his home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77713 - 2012-02-07
[PDF]
State v. William James, Jr.
denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel challenge. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel challenge. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
v. Jane Peckham
with § 893.82(3), Stats. The motion was supported by the affidavit of a paralegal in the Department of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
with § 893.82(3), Stats. The motion was supported by the affidavit of a paralegal in the Department of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer unlawfully stopped his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer unlawfully stopped his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
City of Richland Center v. M&I Bank Southwest
, the City held a security interest in the funds. St. Paul filed a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11750 - 2005-03-31
, the City held a security interest in the funds. St. Paul filed a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11750 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Olsen
a motion to preclude the use of a prior Minnesota drunk driving conviction to enhance his sentence if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
a motion to preclude the use of a prior Minnesota drunk driving conviction to enhance his sentence if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 suppression motion because the officer unlawfully stopped his vehicle. We reject Boettcher’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125387 - 2017-09-21
2 suppression motion because the officer unlawfully stopped his vehicle. We reject Boettcher’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125387 - 2017-09-21